RE: Il nucleare emette meno CO2 del tradizionale?
Sto leggendo da ora con interesse questa diatriba:
http://nuclearinfo.net/Nuclearpower/SSRebuttalResp
poi ho trovato questo doc:STUDIO Oeko Institut
Fonte: http://www.oeko.de/service/gemis/files/d...te2006.pdf
Altro si fa davver ofatica a trovare.
Altre informazioni qui:
http://www.nei.org/keyissues/protectingt...sanalysis/
Molto bello questo passo del rebuttal:
The Mine produces around 3000 tonnes of Uranium annually, so Storm-Smith predict the total energy cost of the Rossing mine to be 69 PJ. Rossing reports their on-site energy usage to be 1 PJ, a factor 69 times smaller than predicted by Storm-Smith. If the 69 PJ predicted by Storm-Smith to be necessary for operation of the mine were provided via Diesel fuel (the cheapest option) it would cost Rossing 1.8 Billion dollars per year. At current prices, the sale of 3000 tonnes of Uranium would only bring around 120 million dollars per year. The entire country of Nambia[5] only consumes 50 PJ of energy annually.
Messaggio modificato il: 11-04-2008 alle 16:36 da fabiodis.
|